General Medicine

© Anthony Lee

Stem Cell Debate

  1. redback

Top
1.   Jul 1, 2007 6:53 PM

» redback - ethics

In response to ethics posted by P_Al:


"too dogmatic" Twas a bit unsure how that fits.

I must admit to being a bit unsure if I answered your question. By listing all the activities totally prohibited or only allowed under licence, I was hoping the answer lay somewhere. A bit lazy as I also cited the quote you questioned but I could not backtrack it to clarify.

Me, I think the 14 days was picked as a "safe" compromise. The USA is not(??) proceeding because it does not feel it has sufficient palatable answers and Australia IS proceeding because it believes it has enough???

My understanding is Australia is not running recklessly into expanded research now allowed by law but they don't doubt or procrastinate about the leeway they now clearly have.

-- posted by redback


Post this Discussion Post to facebook Add this Discussion Post to del.icio.us! Digg this Discussion Post furl this Discussion Post Add this Discussion Post to Reddit Add this Discussion Post to Technorati Add this Discussion Post to Newsvine Add this Discussion Post to Windows Live Add this Discussion Post to Yahoo Add this Discussion Post to StumbleUpon Add this Discussion Post to BlinkLists Add this Discussion Post to Spurl Add this Discussion Post to Google Add this Discussion Post to Ask Add this Discussion Post to Squidoo

Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.